By Charles S. Chihara

ISBN-10: 0199228078

ISBN-13: 9780199228072

ISBN-10: 0199267537

ISBN-13: 9780199267538

Charles Chihara's new booklet develops a structural view of the character of arithmetic, and makes use of it to give an explanation for a couple of remarkable good points of arithmetic that experience questioned philosophers for hundreds of years. particularly, this angle permits Chihara to teach that, so that it will know the way mathematical structures are utilized in technology, it's not essential to think that its theorems both presuppose mathematical gadgets or are even precise. He additionally advances numerous new methods of undermining the Platonic view of arithmetic. a person operating within the box will locate a lot to present and stimulate them right here.

**Read Online or Download A Structural Account of Mathematics PDF**

**Similar logic & language books**

**Download e-book for iPad: Ambiguity and Logic by Frederic Schick**

During this ebook, Frederic Schick extends and applies the choice concept he proposed in prior Cambridge books: realizing motion (1991) and Making offerings (1997). He indicates how the way in which we see events impacts the alternatives we make, and he develops a good judgment of idea aware of how issues are noticeable.

**Download PDF by Richard M. Gale: On the Nature and Existence of God**

There was lately a plethora of defences of theism from analytical philosophers: Richard Gale's vital booklet is a severe reaction to those writings. New types of cosmological, ontological, and non secular adventure arguments are significantly evaluated, in addition to pragmatic arguments to justify religion at the grounds of its prudential or ethical advantages.

**Download e-book for iPad: There Are Two Errors in the the Title of This Book: A by Robert M. Martin**

Martin presents attention-grabbing discussions of every challenge or puzzle, and appends feedback for extra studying in every one case. the place the puzzle or challenge admits of a correct solution, Martin presents it in a separate part. yet he additionally frequently ends with a question; for plenty of of those puzzles and paradoxes, there isn't any solution that's universally permitted as being right.

- Understanding psychology as a science : an introduction to scientific and statistical inference
- The Search for Certainty: A Philosophical Account of Foundations of Mathematics
- Charles S. Peirce's Evolutionary Philosophy
- Substance among Other Categories

**Extra resources for A Structural Account of Mathematics**

**Sample text**

Thus, it is reasonable for Frege to ask: how can an axiom be both? Frege's objection that the axioms of Hilbert's geometry cannot be both does not rest upon any appeal to his theory of 6 Perhaps Hilbert could have responded that he was using the term 'axiom' in two different ways; according to the first way, the axioms are taken to be uninterpreted sentences, whereas according to the second, these same axioms are taken to be interpreted in such a way that they express facts basic to our intuition.

It is this third target that is most obviously relevant to the fourth of my five puzzles. ) How can axioms be definitions? Let us first consider Hilbert's claim that the axioms of his geometry are definitions. What is wrong with that claim? Here, we have to ponder more than one kind of characterization that Hilbert gave of his axioms. In the introduction to his Festschrift on geometry, Hilbert had written: "Geometry requires ... for its consequential construction only a few simple facts. "3 Notice that in this quotation, Hilbert is claiming that the axioms of his geometry express simple, basic facts.

It is this third target that is most obviously relevant to the fourth of my five puzzles. ) How can axioms be definitions? Let us first consider Hilbert's claim that the axioms of his geometry are definitions. What is wrong with that claim? Here, we have to ponder more than one kind of characterization that Hilbert gave of his axioms. In the introduction to his Festschrift on geometry, Hilbert had written: "Geometry requires ... for its consequential construction only a few simple facts. "3 Notice that in this quotation, Hilbert is claiming that the axioms of his geometry express simple, basic facts.

### A Structural Account of Mathematics by Charles S. Chihara

by Charles

4.4